
BLOWING SMOKE
Ways to Clean up,
Reduce and Recirculate Roaster Emissions
by Joachim Eichner
and Vishwa Adluri
MOST OF US WHO ROAST, cup and market coffee do so because we love coffee.
But in the heat of passion, one should remember that coffee
roasting is a business as well. This is true whether we’re setting
coffee prices, dealing with customers, or taking care of those
nearly invisible but very important issues, such as emissions
control.
Forethought about emission control prevents loss of friendly
neighbors, guilty conscience and expensive penalties for non compliance.
Dealing with emissions proactively is not only good for the environment,
but also good for your business and, surprisingly, could be good for
the quality of your coffee.
WHY?
Having spent decades helping roasters reduce and eliminate emissions
produced by coffee roasting, I realized that I really never checked into
what penalties and fines could accrue from non-compliance to environmental
standards. I’m not the only guilty one here—many roasters
also do not know the emissions regulations in their area, or the penalties
they could be charged. A perfect example is Oren Bloostein, president
of Oren’s Daily Roast, who I called to ask about these penalties.
His answer—“I don’t know, and I don’t ever want
to know”—contained a valuable lesson. It isn’t that
Bloostein doesn’t care about having emissions control—he
has an afterburner system, and is investing in a catalyzer system as
well. For him, he is just less interested in knowing the amount of penalties
and fines than he is in preventing putting emissions into the air.
There are three good reasons for roasters to address the emissions
issue aggressively.
Make a Profit
To many of us in the business world, the economic considerations of
emissions controls outweigh tree-hugging sentiments. But penny-wise economics
is a short-sighted and ultimately expensive strategy for running a coffee-roasting
business. Besides the penalties that Bloostein finds too gruesome to
mention, there are several economic factors that speak out for compliance.
Over the past two decades, coffee has progressively brought
together countries of origin, countries of coffee processing, and countries
of consumption. You cannot order coffee in a successful café without
naming an exotic country such as Kenya or Sumatra. Coffee drinkers, for
the most part, care about the world and the environment. Savvy roasting
businesses actually appeal to these green-hearted consumers to educate
as well as make a profit. For these reasons, not only do I recommend
strict emissions compliance, I urge coffee roasters to become environmentally
responsible, and incorporate this sentiment into their entire business
plan. This can only be profitable in the long term.
Love Your Mother
Besides being good for your business, emissions control is obviously
good for the environment. Most scientists believe that human activity
is impacting the environment in many ways, with climate changes being
just one indicator. The emissions we put into the air remain there, and
it is our responsibility to contaminate the environment as little as
possible. Emissions contain a number of chemicals that could be detrimental
to the atmosphere and those breathing it. My favorite argument for remaining
compliant and being environmentally responsible is not economic, but
being socially responsible, and to use a stronger word, ethical.
Love thy Neighbor
Just as parents find their noisy children entertaining while the rest
of us pop Excedrin, so too with coffee aroma. Often, neighbors find this
aroma offensive and the fumes a nuisance. Penalties are costly; therefore
being nice and taking preventative steps—i.e. being polite to your
neighbors is the best strategy. Irate neighbors will interfere in your
business constantly, and this can only distract you from running a good
business and roasting good coffee.
WHERE?
Currently, there are no federal requirements for afterburners.
Title III of the Clean Air Act charges states with the responsibility
of attaining clean air quality within their jurisdictions.
Since emissions standards are not the same everywhere, one could
risk a guilty conscience by starting a roasting plant in a town where
these compliance standards are low or in an area where emissions go undetected.
To allay this guilty conscience, one could argue that they are not breaking
the law.
I’ve also heard the anti-Darwinian argument for such avoidance
behavior: The cost of an afterburner will hurt smaller entrepreneurs.
Again, my advice is not to say what people wish to hear, but what is
good and right for the roaster to do. When writing a business plan, it’s
a good idea to include the cost of emissions control, just as one would
include calculations for health insurance.
Furthermore, moving to a remote location often adds to fuel
costs required to transport coffee for distribution. There are no guarantees
that local emissions laws will remain unchanged forever. The slightest
change in demographics of the plant location will lead to a re-evaluation
of local emissions standards, so you could end up moving to the middle
of nowhere, spending money to transport coffee, and eventually still
face more stringent compliance requirements and associated costs.
How do you find out what the emission regulations are for your
area? Begin your research locally by calling up your county. Many counties
and boroughs have a town engineer on duty. You can also speak to other
businesses in your area. Internet research is increasingly useful, as
many government agencies are posting emissions standards online.
WHAT?
What exactly happens when coffee is processed? Coffee processing is
a laborious and lengthy endeavor, of which roasting is the most significant
but by no means the only emissions-producing phase. The following diagram
shows a schematic of the various stages of coffee processing as well
as the various emissions produced at each stage. The drawing shows both
particulate matter emissions (PMs) and volatile organic compound emissions
(VOC) at each stage of coffee processing. (The SCC numbers are legalese
numbers, and can be ignored.)
Once the coffee reaches the destination goal of perfection,
it is quenched or directly discharged into the cooler. During the first
phase of the cooling process, a lot of smoke is exhausted from the cooler
stack until the roasted coffee is cooled to a level where the smoke emission
stops. The amount of air exhausted from the cooler section is much greater
than that from the roasting section. The cooler fan has a much higher
capacity but a much lower static pressure than the roast fan. In some
parts of the country, such as Washington state, it is required to have
afterburners in the cooler exhaust line as well.
Let us now focus on the roasting process itself. Green coffee
beans contain a wide variety of chemical compounds, including proteins,
fats, sugars, dextrose, cellulose, caffeine and organic acids. When heat
is applied to these beans during roasting, some of these compounds volatize,
oxidize or decompose into toxic by-products of the roast. Unless roasters
are connected to thermal or catalytic oxidizers, toxic compounds such
as aldehydes (as formaldehydes), organic acids (as acetic acid), volatile
organic compounds (VOCs, responsible for much of roast coffee’s
characteristic odor) and arcolein are then exhausted into the atmosphere.
Emissions can be subcategorized into two different types: gaseous
and particulate matter. Suspended particulate matter is often visible
as smoke. The clear bluish white gaseous emissions are caused by distilled
oils and the breakdown of organic products. 
HOW?
Roasting, as well as quenching, cooling and destoning, all produce at
least one of these emission types. Cyclones are typically used to catch
particulate emissions, while afterburners or catalyzers are used to burn
off suspended particles or smoke and toxic gasses.
The most commonly used pollution control device is the afterburner.
Its working principle is very simple. An afterburner works by “burning
off” (thermal oxidation) the air-contaminants. Exhaust air from
the roaster is heated to a preset temperature (of about 1400° F)
and maintained at that temperature for about 0.4 seconds. The exhaust
air temperature from the roaster is around 400° F and needs to be
heated up. The afterburner will burn all volatile organic compounds (VOC)
into carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O), and will eliminate most, but
not all odors. All visible smoke is eliminated. Thermal oxidation is
EPA-approved and produces good clean results. On the downside, afterburners
require a good amount of fuel to operate; also the high temperatures
cause eventual wear and tear to the unit.
The second most common method of cleaning up the air is through
catalyzer units. A catalyst is any substance that accelerates a reaction
without itself being consumed in the process. For example, propane and
carbon monoxide are oxidized as follows by a catalyst.

Exhaust gases from the roasting process are fed through the catalyst
bed, which initiates and promotes oxidation of the combustible emissions,
at temperatures in the range of 750–900° F. Once purchased, a catalyzer is cheaper to operate,
because it operates on nearly half the temperature of an afterburner,
and thus fuel costs are significantly lower. Catalyzers are also EPA
approved. On the downside, catalyzers influence the airflow in a roaster
by producing a differential back pressure. 
There are two major types of catalyzers available: ceramic and
metallic. The back pressure due to a metal catalyst bed is slightly lower
than on a ceramic unit.
I am often asked by roastmasters about the effects of using
a single catalyzer or afterburner for two or more roasters. Personally,
I recommend using separate units for each roaster for a couple of reasons.
First, there is always the risk that the one roaster is influencing the
other when the emissions control device is not engineered accurately.
This means that the roasting environment in the roaster changes due to
smoke or increased pressure. Second, the roasting stage (e.g. quenching
or charging) in one roaster can influence the roaster airflow in the
other roaster. Again, with the same negative results.
Besides oxidation (afterburners and catalyzers) there are other
ways of dealing with emissions. These are not as effective as oxidation,
and are more difficult to deal with.
Of these, the first is dispersion. Dispersion does not actually
eliminate emissions, but merely dilutes them beyond detection either
by the eye or by the nose. A blower or a fan literally disperses the
emissions. This is the equivalent of opening the car window while smoking.
Another device used in the industry is a scrubber. Scrubbers
come in three different models: dry scrubbers, wet scrubbers and gas
scrubbers. Wet scrubbers are the most common. These units wash the gases
and pollutants out of the air in a modified spray chamber. The units
are costly and require more maintenance than either afterburners or catalyzers.
Instead of polluted air, you then have polluted water, which could be
disposed of more discreetly. Jay Endres, president of the Roastery Development
Group, had the ingenious idea of treating the resulting effluent in a
microbiotic scrubbing system filled with live microorganisms that break
down some of the pollutants.
It is also possible to use UV scanners, which remove smoke and
odor from the exiting air. These units need lots of service, because
the glass surface over the UV light has to be cleaned in short intervals.
None of these options is a common means of achieving compliance,
especially in strictly regulated zones.
WHAT’S NOT HOT?
Burners. Most literature on emissions neglects to mention that the burner
effluents from roasting produce nasty chemicals called nitrogen oxide
compounds (NOX). Natural gas burners, as well as afterburners, also produce
carbon dioxide as a byproduct, which may be more detrimental to the atmosphere
than the original exhaust in the long run. Emissions can be greatly reduced
by replacing an old inefficient gas-guzzling burner with a more fuel-efficient
model that burns cleaner and provides energy more efficiently.
There is no way to eliminate burners altogether, obviously,
because it is the source of thermal energy for the roasting process.
In the past decade, however, burner technology has made many exciting
advances. It is good for your budget and for the environment to talk
to a specialist about the efficiency of your existing burners (both your
roaster burner, and the one located in any afterburner you may be already
using). A burner specialist will advise you on various fuel options and
means to reduce NOXs.
I cannot overemphasize the importance of excellent burner controls
in using burners sensibly. A good control system continuously and intelligently
modulates the burner flame as needed by your roast profile. For example,
energy can be saved by programming an afterburner to go on high fire
a few minutes into a roast.
Depending upon the amount of coffee you roast, environment-friendly
burner technology which includes an up-to-date burner and a good basic
control system could recover its cost in gas savings.
WHAT ELSE?
Another way to reduce burner emissions (and save on fuel costs) is to
apply thermal energy to roast coffee beans more efficiently. This is
because temperature gradients within beans are less steep when higher
gas flows and lower inlet temperatures and the same roasting times are
used, than when higher temperature and lower gas flow rates are used.
Rates of pollutant generation during roasting increase exponentially
with temperature. Therefore, for beans with the same average temperature,
beans having a steeper internal temperature gradient will generate more
pollutants than beans with a lower temperature gradient.
Increasing airflows in roasters allows you to roast faster and
at lower temperatures. A rough analogy of how this works is as follows:
You can thaw frost-bitten hands faster by holding them under lukewarm
running water than by holding them in front of a hotter lamp. The higher
rate with which warm water is coming in contact with your cold hands
allows it to deliver thermal energy more efficiently. In my experience,
roasting at lower temperatures with higher airflows improves the taste
of coffee by eliminating the flat and baked tastes produced by very long
roast times.
Another option in improving airflow is to recirculate the air
used in a roaster. Some EPAs recognize recirculating air through a roaster
as method of reducing emissions. The EPA states, “Recirculating
roasters have reduced emissions since they redirect a portion of the
roaster exhaust back through the burners, resulting in the oxidation
of some of the pollutants.” Probat, Neuhaus Neotec and Scolari
produce partial recirculating roasters.
You can also convert your roaster to a recirculating roaster.
Recirculating roasters exhaust only one-third of the air as compared
to regular roasters. Angelo Oricchio, president and CEO of Paramount
Coffee, says “There are cost-effective ways to deal with emissions.
By recirculating the air in my 23R Jabez Burns roaster, I not only reduce
emissions, but I also reduce fuel costs. High airflows mean no buildup
of oil and chaff on the walls of my roaster piping, I have not had to
run any automatic clean outs (ACO) in the year and a half since I converted
my roaster to recirculate. An ACO, which works like the self-cleaning
cycle of an oven, uses a lot of fuel and downtime to heat all the pipes
cherry-red to clean buildup from coffee oils and dust. In addition, my
coffee tastes much better.”
In Oricchio’s recirculating system, one burner does double duty
as both a roaster burner and an afterburner. Because this burner reaches
the temperatures required for oxidizing emissions, you can roast and
burn up emissions in one furnace.
CONCLUSION
Emissions control is an important issue in coffee roasting.
In an environmentally conscious industry where organic coffees
are increasing their market share, unclean air is just not an
option.
As Jim Wayman, president and CEO of Hawaii Coffee Company, says “I
moved to Hawaii because it is a paradise. I have an afterburner,
a catalyzer and my roaster is a recirculating system. Clean
business is actually good business.”
Emissions control does not need to be approached as an unexpected
and superfluous headache. As long as you roast coffee, you will
produce emissions as a natural byproduct. Even as you think
about packaging your coffee to seal in freshness, you have to
think about treating emissions. Just as you would not buy a
car without proper exhausts, you should not operate a roaster
that can cause damage to the environment, annoy your neighbors,
endanger your own health and cost you money.

JOACHIM EICHNER is chief engineer at Praxis International, Inc., NJ.
He may be reached at joachim@roasting.biz or by phone at 973.781.1111.
VISHWA ADLURI is vice president of Praxis International, Inc. He writes
on a variety of subjects ranging from philosophy to coffee roasting technology
and can be reached at va@presocratics.org.
|
|